Monday, August 14, 2023

What If's

What If's

By Ashley



The Science Fiction and Fantasy genre's of literature can be hard to describe. They can take place anywhere, in space, under water, virtual realities, or nowhere at all, in some made up place like Middle Earth in Lord of the Rings. One author, Veronica Roth, described it as the genre of "What If's". What if these certain worldly limitations vanished, or what if humanity discovered this new technology, what if something or everything was different, what would it do to humanity. Authors make us these scenarios and let it play out, focusing in on one character living in that "What If", and playing out how they would respond. 

Thats what makes this genre so special, there are no rules and authors play gods. For me, the difference between Science Fiction and Fantasy is that in Science Fiction, those "What If's" come from a new discovery, something that someone discovered and explored and it changed the world as we know it. In Fantasy, these "What If's" are nothing new and have always existed. Thats not a perfect and all-encompassing description, but it's one way to look at it. 

I've been reading a lot of Science Fiction recently, and with a new advancement in AI technology being released to the public earlier this year, it's got me thinking about how technology is engrained in our lives, and how there are classic and new novels with evolved technology and human mutations as central parts of their "What If's". As technology progresses at this rapid rate, we grow closer to the reality in Ready Player One, with the Oculus virtual reality gaming system, with Artificial Intelligence created text, images, videos, and even music. Many of us work online and are dependent on its function for income. Computers are in everything, cars, fridges, watches, is it a huge stretch to expect that to continue and soon our homes have AI security systems, machines that cook full dinners for us? I don't think it is.

Here's where the human mutations enter the conversation. It's obvious that the generations that grew up with technology are going to be more versed, comfortable, and trusting of technology, and thats increasing with every new generation. The older populations struggle to embrace and adapt to it, but it's not slowing down for them, and it won't for us in the future. Why not somehow equip the human brain to adapt better, like updates in cell-phones and computers, through genetic methods or just new devices and implants? 

Let's step back, and consider what this does to humanity in these fictional stories. Does it even end well? In Ready Player One, reality is crumbling, in The Diabolic, humans build grand spaceships that repaired themselves that they forgot how to build them, replying on a few who kept that information from them, making the public dependent on very few people (that never goes well), and in Void, humanity depends on the net to do everything for them, but anyone with a HEX gene is hunted by the Government. In the end of most of these stories, the Hero/protagonist usually finds that humanity is suffering and stopped evolving

Advanced in technology is coming, and this isn't to say I am not excited to see what it does in the next 20, 30, and 40 years, and it's only even a disaster in Science Fiction, which is fictional, made up, conjecture.

It's fun thinking about, and if this topic is interesting, I recommend picking up some of the 6 books listed below that have tech and human mutations as part of their "What If's". 

:)


Cline, Ernest, 2011, Ready Player One, Random House Publishing Group.

Kincaid, S.J, 2016, The Diabolic, Simon & Schuster.

Falls, Kat, 2010, Dark Life, Scholastic Press.

Scott Card, Orosn, 1977, Ender's Game, Phoenix Rising.

Lassiter, Rhiannon, 2000, Void, Simon & Schuster.

Lowachee, Karen, "Survival Guide", The Best American Science Fiction and Fantasy, Veronica Roth, 2021 Edition, HarperCollionsPublishers, 2021, pp 14-28.

Monday, August 7, 2023

A Catcher in the Rye

  A Catcher in the Rye. 

 By J.D Salinger


I loved this book the first time I read it, but I remember being more confused than anything. I didn't understand the complex emotions Holden was going through, and I felt lost most of the time, but I was in high school at the time, and didn't have much real world experience.

This time though, it was hard to read but was impossible to put down. Thats the beauty of re-reading books after time has past, it always hit you a little different. But Holden went through a lot of things I can relate to. The way he thinks, the way he was alone, the way he kept asking the wrong people for company and attention. 

Maybe thats not something I want to admit to though, after looking into more of the history and effect this book has had on pop culture, apparently its been the backbone or justification or murders who probably felt the world was full of "phonies" just like Holden did. It's beeb banned and unbanned throughout its life because it might inspire some kids to leave school, fail schools, fail society as Holden might have.

Holden and his view of his life during this time gives the misery some company, and then it grow because it feels justified.

How it ended with Holden deciding that he was going to go home and most likely try again at another school and enter into what seems like an unending cycle, but there is some hope still at the end, like maybe one of the random people Holden met in New York made him want to take school more seriously. But who's to say what happened to Holden.  

I would love to read more reviews and other peoples thoughts on this book, and maybe I'll read it again in a few years. 

:)

Ender's Game vs. Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow

 Ender's Game and Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow by Orson Scott Card and Gabrielle Zevin Welcome to the human race. Nobody controls ...