Skip to main content

Ender's Game vs. Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow

 Ender's Game and Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow

by Orson Scott Card and Gabrielle Zevin


Welcome to the human race. Nobody controls his own life. The best you can do is choose to fill the roles given you by good people, by people who love you.

On the surface level, Enders Game and Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow have nothing in common. In fact, the only reason I even thought about these two books being comparable was because I read them one after another, and both had an impact on me, but I wasn't sure what is was. 

Enders Game is a science fiction novel written in 1985, and is about one boy, Ender, being the only hope for the human race to defeat a war against a bee-like alien species. The training for this was was done through strategy games and fake battles, and training began at 6 years old for Ender. 

Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow is realistic fiction and about two people coming together and creating a game that turns into a successful business but also about their lives and how gaming played into that. It was written in 2023 and very real and full of events that affect their relationships and how they each dealt with success and failure. 

After sitting with these books for a while, I realized they do have a common thread; Games. 

All three main characters interacted with games throughout their lives. They all used games as a coping mechanism, Ender when he was feeling alone and hopeless in his training, Sam when he was in the hospital after his mom and he were in a bad car accident, and Sadie after Marx died before they could get married or meet their child. 

After I thought about this, lots of themes started overlapping between novels. 

This quote from Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow, "But it is worth noting that to be good at something is not quite the same as loving it.", describes both Sam and Ender. Sam who was great at mathematics and was going through college for it, and Ender who was considered a genius at war strategy, but neither loved it. Sam had the opportunity to change courses, unlike Ender who would be responsible for the loss of the war if he left or gave up, couldn't. 

Another quote, "Video games don't make people violent, but maybe they falsely give you the idea that you can be a hero.", from Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow, also describes Ender. Ender was chosen, over his just as promising siblings, because he was gentle and compassionate. The games didn't make him violent, in fact, once he found out the games were real, it almost destroyed him because, while he knew he was training for war and to kill the millions of aliens, he figured he would have time to mentally adjust from just winning games to winning wars. 

Games and gaming have become a huge industry in our society. Even people like myself, who are not games beyond the Wii and playing Club Penguin as a kid, hear about the release of new games like Halo and that football one (?). Online player games where you play against people all over the world like Among Us and campaign games have grown along with the availability of the internet. Streamers making playing games live their careers! With the Oculus, we move closer to having our own Oasis (from Ready Player One). Games are not going away, and are reaching wider audiences every year. 

Games are blamed for a lot, like violent tendencies in teenagers, and the fact that kids don't play outside anymore, online bullying and more. After these ideas were introduced to older generations, they became close to the gospel truth, even after many cases of research were completed and didn't support this argument. They ignore that the problems are coming from the real world, not these fake ones on screens.

All I can say, is that every gamer I know uses games to connect with friends who might live far away, or to release stress, or just to enjoy their free time, just like how Sam, Sadie and Ender used them. I mean, is it really any different than watching tv shows? Maybe it's better because the player is engaged and making decisions instead of mindlessly watching shows that just plays for the watcher. 

Anyways, thanks for exploring these books with me, I enjoyed both of these books and recommend reading both! 

:)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What If's

What If's By Ashley The Science Fiction and Fantasy genre's of literature can be hard to describe. They can take place anywhere, in space, under water, virtual realities, or nowhere at all, in some made up place like Middle Earth in Lord of the Rings. One author, Veronica Roth, described it as the genre of "What If's". What if these certain worldly limitations vanished, or what if humanity discovered this new technology, what if something or everything was different, what would it do to humanity. Authors make us these scenarios and let it play out, focusing in on one character living in that "What If", and playing out how they would respond.  Thats what makes this genre so special, there are no rules and authors play gods. For me, the difference between Science Fiction and Fantasy is that in Science Fiction, those "What If's" come from a new discovery, something that someone discovered and explored and it changed the world as we know it. In

A Catcher in the Rye

  A Catcher in the Rye.   By J.D Salinger I loved this book the first time I read it, but I remember being more confused than anything. I didn't understand the complex emotions Holden was going through, and I felt lost most of the time, but I was in high school at the time, and didn't have much real world experience. This time though, it was hard to read but was impossible to put down. Thats the beauty of re-reading books after time has past, it always hit you a little different. But Holden went through a lot of things I can relate to. The way he thinks, the way he was alone, the way he kept asking the wrong people for company and attention.  Maybe thats not something I want to admit to though, after looking into more of the history and effect this book has had on pop culture, apparently its been the backbone or justification or murders who probably felt the world was full of "phonies" just like Holden did. It's beeb banned and unbanned throughout its life because